The FTX estate has been busy recovering assets ever since its spectacular collapse in November 2022. It is deeply committed to protecting the American taxpayer by doing everything possible to realize the highest returns for its creditors. The legal team behind it is leaving no stone unturned in their pursuit of the billions still missing. They have now turned their attention to NFT Stars and Delysium. These lawsuits are focused on claims that both companies did not send tokens to which FTX alleges it has a contractually guaranteed right. These circumstances create nuanced, multi-layered issues related to the enforceability of these agreements tied to tokens, particularly in the context of proceedings in bankruptcy. GreedyChain.com is making sense of it all so you don’t have to. It is chock full of valuable perspectives that will keep you a few steps ahead in the rapidly evolving world of Web3!

Allegations Regarding Tokens

FTX alleges that NFT Stars and Delysium have both failed to provide tokens that are owed to them. This claim is the crux of FTX’s lawsuit against both of these companies. These tokens were allegedly obtained via pre-agreed investments before the collapse of FTX. These lawsuits hope to recover these assets and damages for breach of contract.

Overview of the Claims

FTX’s legal team claims NFT Stars and Delysium have not provided any tokens as outlined in the initial contracts. This breach is considered a fundamental or direct breach of the terms of the contract, which has led FTX to pursue remedies through the courts. The lawsuits are an effort to punish the companies for supposedly violating bankruptcy protections.

Involved Parties

The lawsuits against NFT Stars and Delysium are merely FTX’s latest moves in the case to collect assets and reimburse creditors. Taking stock These efforts aren’t easy and require some serious digging into old deals, investment agreements, and/or violations of the contract. So the obvious thing is to try to reclaim anything back that should properly belong to the FTX estate.

  • FTX Estate: Representing the bankrupt exchange, seeking to recover assets for creditors.
  • NFT Stars: A company that allegedly failed to deliver SENATE and SIDUS tokens.
  • Delysium (Kurosemi): Accused of altering the vesting schedule for AGI tokens and refusing to transfer them to FTX.

Efforts for Recovery

FTX Trading has initiated litigation against NFT Stars and Delysium. They are alleging a breach of contract and seeking the immediate return of the tokens in question. Countering bankruptcy The suits seek compensatory and punitive damages for violations of bankruptcy protections. The automatic stay provision included in U.S. bankruptcy law protects debtors from aggressive collection actions. This safeguard is an essential component of the bankruptcy process.

Legal Actions Taken

Regardless, the fates of these lawsuits are still up in the air. Predictions will depend on all kinds of variables, like the robustness of the contractual language, the interpretation of bankruptcy law, and the proof offered by both parties. Possible outcomes include:

Potential Outcomes

To get a handle on the legal arguments swirling around these ongoing legal battles, it’s import to be familiar with the specifics of each case. The legal arguments against NFT Stars and Delysium differ in tokens, contracts, and purported misconduct.

  • Settlement: An out-of-court agreement where NFT Stars and Delysium agree to return a portion of the tokens or provide other forms of compensation.
  • Court Ruling in Favor of FTX: The court orders NFT Stars and Delysium to return the tokens and potentially pay damages.
  • Court Ruling Against FTX: The court finds that NFT Stars and Delysium are not obligated to return the tokens, potentially due to the complexities of bankruptcy law or weaknesses in the original agreements.

Specifics of the Claims

The NFT Stars and Delysium lawsuits are more consequential than it may appear. A bad outcome would require them to return a large percentage of their tokens. This elimination will put their financial plan in jeopardy and endanger all of their other future builds. What’s more, the ongoing legal fights will tarnish their reputations inside the crypto community.

Nature of Undelivered Tokens

The lawsuit alleges that NFT Stars entered into an agreement to receive $325,000 from Alameda Ventures in November 2021. In exchange, NFT Stars promised to deliver a total of 1.35 million SENATE tokens and 135 million SIDUS tokens. FTX alleges that NFT Stars did not provide these tokens as promised.

  • SENATE and SIDUS tokens (NFT Stars): These tokens are associated with the SIDUS HEROES metaverse project. FTX claims it paid $325,000 for 1.35 million SENATE tokens and 135 million SIDUS tokens in November 2021.
  • AGI tokens (Delysium): These tokens are associated with the Delysium metaverse. Delysium allegedly altered the vesting schedule without FTX's consent and refused to transfer any tokens, citing the ongoing bankruptcy proceedings.

Implications for NFT Stars and Delysium

For Delysium, the situation is more complex. The company purportedly changed the vesting schedule for the AGI tokens to 48 months without prior consent from FTX. Delysium allegedly declined to send over any tokens, due to the pending bankruptcy case. In October 2023, Delysium announced the decision to scale back significantly on Discord. What makes this even worse is their announcement that they won’t be distributing AGI tokens to FTX.

Those suits pose larger issues as to the enforceability of SAFT agreements in bankruptcy court. SAFTs (Simple Agreements for Future Tokens) are investment contracts used to raise capital for blockchain development projects. Usually, these types of projects pre-sell tokens which investors will get at a later date. This hand-off usually takes place after the project has gone live.

Thus, the enforceability of SAFTs in bankruptcy depends on a series of factors. Factors to consider include the terms of the underlying agreement, the laws applicable to the jurisdiction, and the context of the bankruptcy itself. In some jurisdictions, courts will view SAFTs as securities, thus providing investors with certain rights within bankruptcy proceedings. In practical terms, in uncertain factual scenarios, courts may end up treating SAFTs as plain contracts. This classification would greatly reduce investors’ priority on asset distribution.

Legal disputes involving FTX and NFT Stars, together with Delysium, illustrate the complex reality of token contracts. These cases highlight the ambiguities in bankruptcy law. The results of these cases will have huge impact on the outcome for other firms that made similar deals with FTX. These cases underscore the importance of carefully considering the legal and financial risks associated with investing in crypto projects.

Currently, FTX is in the process of suing NFT Stars and Delysium. This combined effort is expected to recover money and increase payouts to creditors following the company’s bankruptcy filed in November 2022. With billions still unaccounted for, the estate is suing to recoup what it says is owed.

The two complaints show that FTX paid $325,000 in November 2021. This payment locked in the 1.35 million SENATE tokens and the 135 million SIDUS tokens from NFT Stars. However, Delysium allegedly unilaterally amended the vesting schedule, lengthening it to 48 months without obtaining FTX’s approval. They too denied any request to transfer tokens, stating that bankruptcy proceedings were still the cause.

The lawsuits seek the return of the assets without delay. They seek damages for breach of contract and demand sanctions for breach of bankruptcy protections, including protection from breach through the automatic stay provision under U.S. bankruptcy law.

All three of these cases may produce precedent-setting results that shape the future of the crypto industry. Their most substantial impact will be on token agreements and bankruptcy law. As these developments are of primary importance to investors and companies, it is imperative that they pay attention to them and consult with knowledgeable legal counsel when appropriate.

The lawsuits seek immediate return of the assets, damages for breach of contract, and sanctions for alleged violations of bankruptcy protections, including those related to the automatic stay under U.S. bankruptcy law.

The outcomes of these cases could have far-reaching consequences for the crypto industry, particularly in the areas of token agreements and bankruptcy law. It is crucial for investors and companies to closely monitor these developments and seek legal advice when necessary.

%%